A black and white photo of the NYC skyline
Rated 5.0 on Avvo

NYC Undisclosed Property Defects Attorney

Superior Skill, Superior Work Ethic, Superior Results

The joy of purchasing a new property can quickly become a headache when undisclosed defects come up after the transaction. If you bought a home and later found problems the seller didn’t disclose, you may be able to recover from the seller for the cost of repairs. This is where a real estate attorney for non-disclosure issues comes in.

At Richman Law Firm PLLC, we’ve litigated real estate disputes for years and know how to recover the costs of undisclosed defects for New Yorkers. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Determining Parties Responsible for Defects After Purchase

Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware)

Caveat Emptor is a Latin term meaning “Buyer Beware.” It is a traditional legal rule that places the onus on the buyer to ensure the quality and suitability of a property before purchase. New York state still follows caveat emptor in most home sales—buyers are expected to inspect and investigate before closing.

What has changed is that sellers may not actively hide a known defect, and most sellers of one- to four-family homes must provide the buyer with a standardized disclosure form before the contract is signed. Due diligence remains the buyer’s responsibility, but a seller who conceals or lies about a problem may be held accountable.

Buyer’s Due Diligence

In real estate transactions, due diligence refers to the process where the buyer carefully investigates the details of a property before finalizing the deal.

This process includes verifying the information provided by the seller, inspecting the property, checking for legal issues, and assessing the property’s value. A buyer’s due diligence may involve hiring professionals to examine all aspects of the property and contract drafts.

Due diligence enables the buyer to learn about defects before closing a sale. Additionally, in the event of future legal disputes, it provides evidence that the buyer fulfilled their responsibilities and identifies any third parties who may be liable.

Laws Applied to Failure to Disclose

In New York, a buyer’s strongest tool against undisclosed defects usually comes from the common law—a claim for fraud or active concealment—together with the Property Condition Disclosure Act (PCDA), the statute that governs a seller’s disclosure form.

The Property Condition Disclosure Act (PCDA)

A seller who willfully fails to meet the Act’s requirements—including by knowingly providing false information on the form—may be held liable for the buyer’s actual damages. Whether a particular failure rises to that level depends on the facts, and the disclosure form is a starting point rather than a guarantee.

This act ensures transparency in real estate transactions, protecting the buyer from purchasing a property with undisclosed defects. Failure to provide this disclosure or false information can result in the seller being held liable for the buyer’s damages, and the buyer may be entitled to compensation.

Claims Against Sellers

Buyers who purchase a property and later discover that the seller failed to disclose home defects may have a claim against the seller.

A claim against a seller is usually based on fraud (including active concealment of a known defect) or breach of contract, depending on what the seller knew and what the contract promised.

It’s also worth noting that the seller’s liability can extend beyond the immediate financial impact of repairing the defect. If the property’s value is significantly reduced due to the defect, the seller could be held responsible for this depreciation.

Claims Against Property Inspectors

Property inspectors play a key role in real estate transactions, providing a detailed home inspection report of a property’s condition. The information they provide can influence a buyer’s decision to purchase a property and the price they are willing to pay.

Yet, suppose an inspector fails to identify a significant defect that should have been reasonably discovered during the inspection. In that case, buyers may have a claim against them for negligence or breach of contract. These damages can include the cost of repairs, a decrease in the property’s value, and other related expenses.

It’s important to note that not all defects will necessarily give rise to a claim against a certified home inspector. They are not typically responsible for defects that are hidden or that become evident only after the inspection.

Claims Against Real Estate Brokers

A real estate broker owes fiduciary duties—including loyalty and full disclosure—to the client the broker represents, which in most sales is the seller. A seller’s agent does not represent the buyer’s interests, but New York law still requires that agent to deal honestly and in good faith with the buyer and to disclose known material defects affecting the property’s value. When a seller’s agent hides or misrepresents a known defect, the buyer may have a claim against the agent.

If a broker fails to disclose known defects or misrepresents the property condition, they may be liable for any damages buyers incur.

Types of Defects Sellers and Brokers Must Disclose

Material Defects: Material defects are issues that could affect the property’s value or safety. These might include structural problems such as foundation cracks, roof leaks, or issues with major systems like plumbing or electrical wiring.

Latent Defects: Latent defects are hidden problems that may not be readily noticed during a routine inspection but could cause damage or pose a risk to occupants’ safety later. These might include major issues like mold, asbestos, or termite infestation.

Common Undisclosed Defects After Closing in NYC

  • Structural Defects
  • System Defects
  • Environmental Hazards
  • Building code violations

What to Do If You Bought a House With Undisclosed Problems

No homeowner likes to discover hidden or undisclosed home defects that could affect their property value. If you notice signs of a serious defect after purchasing property:

  • Document the defect: Take photographs, make notes, and gather relevant documentation.
  • Contact a professional: Have the defect assessed by a professional to understand its extent and potential repair cost.
  • Consult an attorney: Seek legal advice to increase your chances of reaching fair compensation.

Statute of Limitations

In New York, the deadline depends on the type of claim. A claim that a seller concealed or misrepresented a defect is usually treated as fraud, which generally must be brought within six years of the sale or two years from when the buyer discovered (or reasonably could have discovered) the problem.

A contract-based claim generally carries a six-year deadline. Because the right deadline turns on how the claim is framed, it’s best to speak with an attorney promptly. In the case of a claim against a property inspector or a real estate broker, the statute of limitations could be different. Consult our attorneys to discuss your options.

Contact Us for a Free Consultation

If you’ve discovered undisclosed home defects in your property and believe you have a valid claim against the seller, property inspector, or real estate broker, don’t hesitate to reach out to our real estate attorneys for a free consultation.

FAQ

What are undisclosed property defects?

When you purchase property in NYC and issues that should have been listed by the seller before the close start to show, you likely have undisclosed property defects in your hands. These can be structural problems like foundation issues or roof damage to environmental hazards such as mold or asbestos. Most sellers of one-to-four-family homes must complete a property condition disclosure form answering questions about the property based on what they actually know, and they may not hide defects they are aware of. Outside of that, buyers are expected to inspect and investigate the property before closing deals.

How can I protect myself against property defects?

To protect yourself against property defects:

  • Hire a professional home inspector to examine the property.
  • Review the seller’s property disclosure statement carefully.
  • Ask specific questions about the property’s condition and history.
  • Include contingency clauses in your purchase agreement.
  • If possible, speak with neighbors about any known issues in the area.
  • Document everything.

Can the real estate agent be responsible for defects on my property?

A seller’s agent must deal honestly with the buyer and disclose material defects the agent actually knows about, so an agent who conceals or misrepresents a known defect may be liable. Agents aren’t responsible for hidden defects they had no knowledge of. If you need help determining who’s potentially liable, contact our undisclosed property defects attorneys.

Does a New York seller have to disclose problems with a house?

Under New York’s “buyer beware” tradition, sellers are not automatically on the hook for every flaw. Still, New York law requires most sellers of one- to four-family homes to provide the buyer with a property condition disclosure statement before closing. That form asks the home seller to report known problems with the structure, systems, and grounds. When a home buyer relies on answers the seller knew were false, there may be grounds to hold the seller responsible.

What kind of defect is serious enough to matter?

Courts look at whether the problem is a material fact, meaning something that could change the property’s value or affect a reasonable buyer’s decision. A leaking foundation, a failing septic system, or hidden construction defects may qualify. What often decides a case is whether the seller knew about it when they signed the disclosure form.

The contract said the house was sold “as is.” Do I still have a case?

An ‘as is’ clause limits many claims, but it doesn’t let a seller lie. If the seller knew about a defect and took real steps to hide it—painting over water damage, for example, or making a false statement to derail your inspection—an ‘as is’ sale may not shield them. New York courts have allowed fraud claims to move forward.

Is an undisclosed defect a breach of the purchase contract?

It can be. Beyond the disclosure form, a real estate contract usually contains representations about the property’s condition, and when a seller breaches those promises, a home buyer may bring contract claims alongside a fraud claim. The specific contract terms control what was promised and what relief is available. New York recognizes both statutory and common law paths, so the right approach depends on the wording of your deal.

What can I recover if I bought a home with hidden defects?

An aggrieved party who discovers a serious defect after closing often seeks actual damages, usually measured by the gap between the agreed-upon purchase price and the property’s value in its true condition, plus repair costs. In some real estate disputes, a buyer may pursue other remedies, and where a seller refuses to close, a buyer might even seek specific performance to force the sale. The remedy depends on when the problem surfaced and how the purchase contract was written.

What if the problem involves the property line or a neighbor?

Not every hidden issue sits inside the walls. Undisclosed encroachments, boundary disputes, or easements that limit land use can surface after closing and reduce what property owners can do with the land. If a structure crosses onto a neighbor’s property, or a neighbor’s improvement crosses onto yours, the seller’s failure to disclose a known boundary issue may support a claim. These matters often turn on survey records and deed history.

How quickly do I need to act after finding a defect?

New York has deadlines for fraud and contract claims, and evidence like the disclosure form, inspection reports, and communications is easier to preserve early, so an injured party should act quickly once a hidden defect comes to light. Many disputes begin with a demand letter to the seller that lays out the problem and what you are seeking. Moving promptly protects both your evidence and your legal options.

How do we prove the seller knew about the problem and hid it?

This is often the hardest part of a case. Useful evidence can include past repair records, prior insurance claims, building permits, statements from neighbors or contractors, and answers on the disclosure form that turned out to be false.

The seller painted over the damage before selling. Does that count as hiding it?

Covering up a known defect so an inspection won’t catch it is what New York law calls active concealment, one of the main exceptions to “buyer beware.” When a seller takes concrete steps to keep you from finding a problem, their silence no longer protects them. Whether a specific repair crosses that line depends on the details.

Our inspector missed it. Are we stuck, or can we still go after the seller?

A home inspection can work both ways. A seller may argue you had the chance to find the defect yourself, though that argument weakens when the problem was hidden in a way a reasonable inspection could not catch. Depending on what your inspector agreed to and what they overlooked, there may be a separate question about their responsibility, too.

Can we undo the sale?

Remedies depend on the strength of the case and the size of the loss. Buyers often seek the cost of repairs or the difference between what the home was worth as described and its real condition. In serious fraud cases, a court may allow rescission, which unwinds the sale and returns both sides to where they started. But every case is different.

The listing said city sewer, but the house is on septic. Can we act on that?

A false statement about a home’s systems, whether in the listing, in emails, or on the disclosure form, can support a misrepresentation claim if the seller knew the truth and you relied on it. The same logic applies to claims that renovations were permitted or that a roof was newly replaced. What you can prove about the seller’s actual knowledge is usually the deciding factor.

Schedule a Free Consultation

Primary Contact Form
SCOTT B. RICHMAN, ESQ.

Managing Member & Founder

5.0
on Avvo

Mr. Richman is the Managing Member and Founder of Richman Law Firm PLLC. In his role as Managing Member, Mr. Richman oversees the day-to-day operations of the firm and handles the litigation of the most complex legal matters across a vast array of practice areas and disciplines.

Read What Our Clients Say About Us

Client Testimonials

    Scott Richman was hands down the best attorney we have ever had. He helped our company solve a tricky and challenging problem with speed, efficiency and professionalism. His knowledge and attention to detail go well beyond this 5 star rating. He is exceptional at what he does and I would highly recommend him.

    Scott of Richman Law is fantastic. Communicative, diligent, and reliable. He went above and beyond to ensure we not only received what we deserved, but more. If you’re looking for a fantastic lawyer, you’ve found one in Scott!

    Scott is a phenomenal lawyer. He came through for us when we were in desperate need of help. Scott always got back to us quickly for any questions we had. Highly recommend and would no doubt use his services again if needed.

    Scott proved to be an exceptional attorney, navigating my case with remarkable swiftness and unwavering diligence. In addition, Danielle exuded both warmth and professionalism, further enhancing my overall experience. I wholeheartedly recommend.