A black and white photo of the NYC skyline
Rated 5.0 on Avvo

NYC Partition Actions Attorney

Superior Skill, Superior Work Ethic, Superior Results

Owning property in New York often means sharing it with family, friends, or business partners. While co-ownership can make real estate possible for high-demand cities, disagreements are inevitable. When owners can’t agree on how to manage or sell a property, a partition action may be the best way forward.

Co-ownership is also common in cases where two or more people inherit a property, buy it together before marriage, or keep owning it together after a divorce. Disputes often happen when one owner wants to sell the property and the other does not. Sometimes, the co-owner who does not want to sell is not in a position to buy out the selling co-owner’s share.

Partition actions require a lot of legal work. The court has many requirements, and mistakes can be costly. Whether you are the target of a partition action or the initiator of one, you’ll need a skilled real estate attorney on your side. Contact us today for a free consultation.

What Are Partition Actions?

A partition action is a legal process used when two or more people co-own real property and cannot agree on how to manage or divide it. When this happens, New York real estate law provides a solution known as a partition action.

If a fair physical division would cause great prejudice, the court generally orders a public auction, and the court’s judgment distributes the net proceeds based on each party’s adjudicated share, including any appropriate debits/credits (taxes, necessary repairs, use and occupancy, or equalizing payments)

Co-owners can also voluntarily sell without going to court, but they’ll need a solid settlement agreement to protect all parties involved.

Both a court order and an agreement will have provisions for more than the disposition of the sale proceeds. For instance, it should cover who pays property taxes and upkeep costs until the property sells.

New York law recognizes different methods for resolving partition disputes, and each type can significantly impact a case.

Types of Partition in New York

Partition in Kind

If it is possible to divide property physically, then the courts may do so, essentially turning one property into two. The owners of each of the newly created entities are free to do as they wish with their property.

If the land can be divided without reducing overall value, the court may split it into parcels whose values match the owners’ interests.

Voluntary Partitions

Outside court, co-owners can resolve matters by agreement—for instance, a buyout or listing the property for sale. Separately, any tenant in common can usually sell their own undivided interest (though that doesn’t force the entire property to be sold). Inherited family property is the exception: under New York’s heirs’ property law, the relatives who co-own it generally have 180 days to match an outside buyer’s offer on the same terms, and an outsider who buys in cannot bring a partition action.

This is common when everyone involved is an investor, but it can be harder when owners are related. Family members may object to sharing ownership of a property with someone outside the family.

Partition by Sale

If a fair physical split would cause great prejudice, courts generally order a public auction (in non-heirs cases). In heirs’ property cases, the statute prefers an open-market sale with a broker unless the court finds another method is better for everyone.

After the sale, the referee reports to the court, which confirms the sale and distributes net proceeds according to the parties’ adjudicated shares and any credits/debits.

Before the proceeds are divided, the court ensures that any outstanding liens, mortgages, property taxes, and expenses related to the sale are paid.

Common Scenarios Where a Partition Action Is Necessary

Co-owners Cannot Agree on Selling or Managing Real Property

Partition actions are often necessary when co-owners of a property reach an impasse over the sale or management of the real estate. Differences in opinions on whether to keep, sell, or develop the property can create significant tension.

One Party Wants to Cash Out, Others Refuse

Another common reason for partition actions happens when one party wishes to sell their share of the property and receive their equity in cash, while the other co-owners prefer to retain ownership and refuse to buy out the selling party’s interest.

Disputes Over Real Estate Expenses, Rent, or Upkeep

Another reason for partition actions is disputes arising from the management of co-owned property, including disagreements over payment of property taxes, maintenance costs, repairs, or the distribution of rental income. When co-owners fail to agree on how expenses should be shared or how income should be divided, tensions can escalate.

Inherited Property

When heirs inherit real estate jointly, there may be differing desires—some may want to keep the family home or land, while others may wish to sell. When heirs cannot reach an agreement, a partition action facilitates either a sale or division of the property, protecting each heir’s equity.

The Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA)

The UPHPA 2019, codified at RPAPL § 993, addresses inherited property, often called heirs’ property. This law helps to prevent forced sales that can disrupt long-held family lands.

For heirs’ property cases, the court must hold a mandatory settlement conference, and parties must negotiate in good faith toward options like a buyout, partition in kind, or open-market sale.

The Act applies to ‘heirs’ property’—real property held as tenants in common that is used for residential or agricultural purposes, where at least one co-tenant acquired an interest from a relative, there is no written agreement among all the co-tenants governing partition, and a family-ownership threshold is met (for example, relatives hold 20 percent or more of the interests, or a co-tenant who inherited a share lives there). Commercial property, and property covered by a co-ownership agreement, fall outside the Act.

Protections include:

  • A mandatory settlement conference
  • A co-tenant buyout process, letting non-selling co-owners purchase the interests of those seeking a sale at the court-determined value
  • If a sale is ordered, a preference for an open-market sale, unless the court finds sealed bids or an auction would be better for all co-tenants

An occupying co-owner cannot unilaterally stop a partition, but in heirs’ property cases the court follows a set order. The non-selling co-owners first get the chance to buy out the shares of those who want to sell. If that doesn’t happen, the court must order a physical division unless it finds, after weighing factors like how long the family has owned the property, who lives there and how they’d be harmed, sentimental value, and who has been paying the taxes and upkeep, that dividing it would cause great manifest prejudice to the co-owners as a group. Only then does a sale follow.

Contact Us for a Free Consultation

Having an experienced partition action attorney in your corner can make all the difference in solving disputes between co-owners in the city.

At Richman Law Firm PLLC, we have years of experience helping property owners work toward a fair resolution.

Whether you are initiating or defending against a partition action, skilled legal guidance makes sure that your interests are represented every step of the way. Contact us to schedule a free consultation today.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the court determine a fair resolution in partition cases?

Courts first determine everyone’s legal share and whether a physical split can be done without great prejudice. If not, the court typically orders a public auction (or in heirs’ cases, an open-market sale). The judgment then allocates the net proceeds based on the adjudicated shares and any accounting adjustments.

What happens if one partner or spouse refuses to sell the property?

Co-owners who hold as tenants in common or as joint tenants can bring a partition case if they can’t agree. Exception: property held by spouses as tenants by the entirety generally isn’t subject to involuntary partition during the marriage.

How does a neutral third party get involved in partition disputes?

Courts commonly appoint a referee to conduct the sale and report back; value may be established through appraisals and the evidence. In heirs’ property cases, the court fixes the property’s fair market value before any buyout or sale. Unless the co-owners agree on a value, the court usually orders an appraisal by a disinterested licensed appraiser, gives everyone a chance to object, and holds a hearing before adopting a number.

Can your law firm help co-owners in New York City with partition disputes?

Yes. Our firm helps clients across New York City go through the legal process of real estate partitions. We serve clients who are unable to reach an agreement with co-owners and need to protect their financial interests in the subject property. Whether you are an owner, a partner, or a family member involved in a dispute, our attorneys can help resolve the matter on your behalf and work toward the best outcome.

Schedule a Free Consultation

Primary Contact Form
SCOTT B. RICHMAN, ESQ.

Managing Member & Founder

5.0
on Avvo

Mr. Richman is the Managing Member and Founder of Richman Law Firm PLLC. In his role as Managing Member, Mr. Richman oversees the day-to-day operations of the firm and handles the litigation of the most complex legal matters across a vast array of practice areas and disciplines.

Read What Our Clients Say About Us

Client Testimonials

    Scott Richman was hands down the best attorney we have ever had. He helped our company solve a tricky and challenging problem with speed, efficiency and professionalism. His knowledge and attention to detail go well beyond this 5 star rating. He is exceptional at what he does and I would highly recommend him.

    Scott of Richman Law is fantastic. Communicative, diligent, and reliable. He went above and beyond to ensure we not only received what we deserved, but more. If you’re looking for a fantastic lawyer, you’ve found one in Scott!

    Scott is a phenomenal lawyer. He came through for us when we were in desperate need of help. Scott always got back to us quickly for any questions we had. Highly recommend and would no doubt use his services again if needed.

    Scott proved to be an exceptional attorney, navigating my case with remarkable swiftness and unwavering diligence. In addition, Danielle exuded both warmth and professionalism, further enhancing my overall experience. I wholeheartedly recommend.